User Tools

Site Tools


peerreview

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
peerreview [2019/03/07 14:11]
zavijava created
peerreview [2019/07/14 00:17] (current)
chissoku
Line 29: Line 29:
   * have a mood greater than 50   * have a mood greater than 50
   * be in good standing with the moderators   * be in good standing with the moderators
-  * have some time in the system+  * have been in the system ​for more than a month
  
 Then, when a task is available for the reviewer, it will be displayed like this: Then, when a task is available for the reviewer, it will be displayed like this:
Line 52: Line 52:
 The score slider: By moving the button from left (bad rating) to left (good rating), the reviewer can see a rating between 1 and 10. The score slider: By moving the button from left (bad rating) to left (good rating), the reviewer can see a rating between 1 and 10.
 A score inferior to 5 or superior to 8 will automatically mark the task for an additional review by a moderator. A score inferior to 5 or superior to 8 will automatically mark the task for an additional review by a moderator.
-Score |Mood +|Score|Mood| 
-1-2 |-3 +|1-2|-3| 
-3 |-1 +|3|-1| 
-4-5 |0 +|4-5|0| 
-6-7 |2 +|6-7|2| 
-8-9 |3 +|8-9|3| 
-10 |5+|10|5|
 Every task is only reviewed by one person, but it could be increased in the future. Every task is only reviewed by one person, but it could be increased in the future.
  
Line 82: Line 82:
   * It needs information ​ from the suer after the task has ended (picture, response…) like the public exposure tasks   * It needs information ​ from the suer after the task has ended (picture, response…) like the public exposure tasks
  
-Each picture (or groupof picture ​saved by the system (with the cam command) should be properly annotated using the log command, to explain the reviewer what he is supposed to see in the picture.+Each picture (or group of pictures) ​saved by the system (with the cam command) should be properly annotated using the log command, to explain the reviewer what he is supposed to see in the picture.
  
 Some examples of log: Some examples of log:
peerreview.1551967913.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/03/07 14:11 by zavijava